Right-First-Time: How to Reduce THT Wave Soldering Process Setup Effort by 50%

Dr. Reinhardt Seidel DEEPTRONICS GmbH, Johannes Ollech and Manuel Hart Sentinum GmbH

A case study on steamlining selective wave soldering process setup

Take aways

  • Cut trial and error in preheating and soldering by 50% through precise calculations.
  • Achieve preheat temperature calculations with an error margin of just ±8°C.
  • Determine optimal solder contact times on the first attempt.
  • Boost production cycle time efficiency by 25%.

The Problem:
Inefficiencies in THT Process Setup Are Costing You

Your customers are unwilling to foot the bill for inefficiencies in your process setup. Setting up a new soldering process often requires multiple trial-and-error cycles to identify the optimal parameters for preheating and wave soldering. These iterations are time-consuming, waste resources, tie up machine capacity, and ultimately lead to financial losses.

Setting up a new soldering process usually requires multiple trial and error cycles to identify the product specific set of parameters for preheating and soldering. These multiple iterations are time consuming, resource wasting and machine capacity consuming and ultimately end up in loss of money. 

The figure shows the iterative activities that have to be done to setup the preheating and soldering parameters of a selective wave soldering process for through hole technology (THT). 

Process setup is not a productive task; the more steps required to find a good process window, the more money is lost.

The Challenge that causes iterations

There are no standardized rules or labels on components or PCBs indicating the required soldering energy. This forces you to rely on trial and error to determine optimal settings. Your task is to find parameters that meet the thermal demands of electronic component pins placed in plated through holes (PTH) of a printed circuit board (PCB), often multilayered.

Wave soldering involves complex physical phenomena, making it difficult to establish a working process setup without experimentation. Hitting the absolute optimum without trials is nearly impossible. Default parameters may sometimes work but can lead to overshooting thermal requirements for easy solder joints or underestimating those for more challenging ones. This results in multiple trial-and-error cycles during THT process setup.

The Solution: First-Time-Right THT wave soldering Process with Digital Twin Simulation

Making informed decisions on process parameters can reduce both the cost and time for setup while enhancing cycle time efficiency. Here’s how:

1. Preheat calculation
with the Digital twin of the machine

By utilizing a digital twin of the soldering machine, you can calculate the preheat profile and simulate preheat parameters specific to your product. This allows you to select process temperatures and flux materials without iterative measurements. 

The validation of the preheat temperature calculation on the PCB top side in the figure proves good fit between calculation and measurement. Based on this calculation the preheat parameters can be chosen to suit the flux (REGI 007) process window.

Exemplary preheat temperature calculation for 60% and 100% preheating power.

In our case study using a 4-layer PCB layout of a sensor application (1.0 mm thick), the error between calculated and measured temperature development is only between 5°C and 10°C. This is an excellent first attempt, considering variable conditions inside the preheating stage and minimal product data used. After leaving the preheating module, the global PCB temperature gradually cools down, even during soldering.

2. Digital solderability analysis of the PCB layout

Conducting a PCB analysis for THT solderability provides a relative measure to evaluate each solder joint. Solder joints are color-coded—green indicates easier-to-solder joints, while red signifies more challenging ones.

This analysis helps soldering experts identify the most difficult solder joints immediately. Starting the soldering sequence with the most challenging joints ensures that the PCB has not cooled down significantly after preheating, allowing for shorter solder contact times. By sequencing from red to green, you optimize process efficiency.

The wave solderability of a PCB layout is primarily defined by the copper connection between the plated through hole and the copper layer considering the number of layers, their thicknesses and their position in the inner PCB area.
The solderability of the THT solder joints on a PCB layout helps the soldering expert choosing the most efficient soldering sequnce.

3. Calculating Optimal Solder Contact Times in Selective Wave Soldering

Finding the right solder contact times for each solder joint balances achieving acceptable hole fill per IPC-A610 standards and avoiding thermal damage to the PCB and components.

The required solder contact time for each joint can be calculated based on:

·        Solder temperature

·        Preheat temperature

·        Nozzle size

·        Solder alloy

The calculation of a solder contact time estimation is the basis for a efficient process development with reduced trial and error iterations. Compared with the default parameters one can achieve better overall quality at 25% less solder cycle time.
Solder contact time recommendations for each solder joint compared to default parameters, achieving a 25% reduction in cycle time.

As shown in the table, individual solder contact time recommendations can significantly improve efficiency. Compared to a default setting of 2 seconds per joint, these calculations can lead to a 25% faster cycle time.

The recommended solder contact time is 3 seconds for the most challenging solder joint (No. 15). Using machine learning-based estimation of hole fill over time, this can be validated through time-hole fill scenario calculations at different soldering temperatures.

To validate the plausibility of the wave solder contact time recommentation, a machine learning based approach validates the recommendation.
Validation of the recommended solder time for solder temperature 280°C, preheat temperature top side: 110°C, nozzle size: 3/6 wettable, solder alloy SAC305.

Optimizing solder contact time without knowing the inner layer connections is like playing darts blindfolded—you’re unlikely to hit the target.

Conclusion: Achieve Efficiency and Precision with Digital Twin Technology

Ultimately, leveraging digital twin-based process simulation allows you to dramatically reduce trial-and-error cycles traditionally associated with THT process setup. This not only cuts down on setup time and costs but also optimizes production efficiency and product quality.

Benefits at a Glance:

  • 50% Reduction in Trial and Error: Save time and resources by accurately calculating preheat and soldering parameters from the start.
  • Precision Within ±5°C: Achieve highly accurate preheat temperature calculations, minimizing the risk of thermal damage.
  • Optimal Solder Contact Times: Determine the best solder contact times on the first try, enhancing product consistency.
  • 25% Faster Cycle Times: Increase production efficiency by optimizing soldering sequences and parameters.

Take the Next Step Towards Optimized THT Processes

Don’t let inefficient setups drain your resources. Embrace digital twin technology to achieve right-first-time setups and stay ahead in the competitive electronics manufacturing industry.

Ready to revolutionize your THT process setup?

Contact DEEPTRONICS

to learn how our software solutions can transform your production efficiency.

Share This :

fIND US ON:

Email Us

info(at)deeptronics.io